In this blog post, we delve into the pivotal role of employee participation in shaping successful companies, especially in times of economic uncertainty. Extensive research, spanning decades and various economic crises, consistently demonstrates that companies offering co-ownership opportunities are more resilient. Studies from America emphasize the positive impact of participation plans on sales, productivity, and social performance, affirming the value of inclusive approaches in weathering economic storms.
Employee participation is certainly one of the factors that make a company great. From the bottom to the top, it’s in all of our interests to have involved and invested employees. And this has been proven time and time again—especially when it comes to the question of business continuity.
A company that offers its employees the opportunity to become co-owner is more resilient in times of crisis. This is not the conclusion of a recent study, but the result of research that has been conducted for decades around times of crisis. We’re talking about the 80s, 90s, and around ’08. We saw the latest blow being dealt by the coronavirus pandemic.
Most research into the impact of employee participation on the performance and resilience of companies in difficult times comes from America. There (due to good legislation) a significantly larger group of employees is co-owner of the company they work for. In an interesting article on the website of the National Center of Employee Ownership (NCEO) some research results from ’86 , ’87, ’96, ’00, ’08, ’10, ’12 and ’14 are bound together to provide a clear overview of the (positive) influence of employee participation plans on the performance of a company. This shows that companies with participation plans:
Ultimately, the Upjohn Institute study “How Did Employee Ownership Firms Weather the Last Two Recessions?“ shows the positive influence of employee participation on the survival of a crisis. Companies with an employee participation plan had the fewest layoffs in both 1999 and 2009 and they were up to 20% less likely to go out of business. It also showed that companies whose employees are co-owners showed much greater social cohesion. A kind of corporate nationalism, which ensures that its community (however small) stands up for each other, so that harder economic blows can be absorbed.
What about that direct blow to the economy from the coronavirus pandemic? Ultimately, it is easy to explain why our financial engine stalls during the outbreak of an unstoppable, violent flu wave. When people can no longer work together, can no longer form a group and have to continue alone, a company loses all the strength it has as an ‘organism’. A society where everyone works together has the tremendous effect that the whole is worth more than the sum of its parts. Literally: Two individuals will not get further than themselves. When two people work together, this quickly has the effect of three. In larger groups, 100 people working well together can produce more than 100 people working on something individual at the same time. This also means that more value can circulate in a group where everyone works together and is in contact with each other than in an equally large group where this is not the case. Now that everyone is at home due to the pandemic, that powerful economic device is stalling. People no longer work together, no longer produce together and are left to their own devices.
Furthermore, the European Federation of Employee Ownership and the European Parliament have conducted several studies on the influence of employee participation plans and published the very positive results. The interest of the European Parliament is not only based on interest in business operations. This is also fueled by self-interest. Unsurprisingly, an entire community’s economy is more resilient to financial slump when there are more employee participation plans and employee owners in the community. It makes companies more resilient, and thus the economy as a whole more stable.
“Is the opposite also true?”, I wonder. Are economies with a central group of ‘owners’, ‘rich’, less unruly? Indeed, it turns out that the more centrally capital is governed – and the more centralized ownership is – the harder an economic blow can hit. Unfortunately, not every country in Europe has already put this on the agenda so well that the legislation has been adjusted accordingly. As explained in previous Share Council articles, there are still many bureaucratic hurdles to overcome before an employee can be made a co-owner. But with small steps – and especially through digitization – we always come a bit closer to the ideal situation where everyone co-owns the company they work for.
These are exciting times, around Corona. We are preparing for a significant economic storm. In addition, we like to work hard for Dutch SME’s. Have you also thought about making all your employees co-owners and going through the heavy weather with them? Are you suffering from hard liquidity blows?
Suppose there are liquid challenges and you are looking for alternatives… we provide a Quick Scan free of charge to gain immediate insight into whether these alternatives (participations, making shares available, etc) can be used for your company to solve financial problems.
Share Council’s participation platform ensures that there is no need to think about administration after setting up the structure and selecting the contracts. Everything is arranged and maintained for you in the background. We have a range of payment plans available, so no matter what your budget is or how much time you have to spend on participation, we have a plan that will work for you.
To find out more about employee engagement, participation plans and how this can benefit your situation? Book a demo with our CEO.